<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Engaging Like A Rockstar: Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thisisjustin.com/engaging-like-a-rockstar-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thisisjustin.com/engaging-like-a-rockstar-part-1/</link>
	<description>Business &#124; Technology &#124; Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 01:33:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky   Price</title>
		<link>http://www.thisisjustin.com/engaging-like-a-rockstar-part-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky   Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 05:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thisisjustin.com/2008/03/14/engaging-like-a-rockstar-part-1/#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Engagement is a fickle thing.  If I want the shortest answer to todays headlines, I look at AOL or Yahoo.  I spend less than 10 minutes scanning their headlines, but trust me, I  I visit them often.  On the other hand, some websites are so difficult to navigate that I have to spend five or six minutes looking for the post I want.  That artificially increases my &quot;engagement factor&quot;.  I end up spending more time on a website that actually means less to me.
There&#039;s no silver bullet.  The  web is new compared to the telegraph, so I suspect that more tests/regulations/standards are going to be tried and applied before we finally figure out what really matters.
I personally think that unique visitors will come to the forefront again in the future.  It will be part of a larger algorithm, but they&#039;ll be important again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Engagement is a fickle thing.  If I want the shortest answer to todays headlines, I look at AOL or Yahoo.  I spend less than 10 minutes scanning their headlines, but trust me, I  I visit them often.  On the other hand, some websites are so difficult to navigate that I have to spend five or six minutes looking for the post I want.  That artificially increases my &#8220;engagement factor&#8221;.  I end up spending more time on a website that actually means less to me.<br />
There&#8217;s no silver bullet.  The  web is new compared to the telegraph, so I suspect that more tests/regulations/standards are going to be tried and applied before we finally figure out what really matters.<br />
I personally think that unique visitors will come to the forefront again in the future.  It will be part of a larger algorithm, but they&#8217;ll be important again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

